SUBCHAPTER II—MAINE INDIAN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

§1721. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §2, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1785, which set out Congressional findings and declaration of policy, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Short Title

Pub. L. 96–420, §1, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1785, provided that Pub. L. 96–420, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980".

§1722. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §3, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1786, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1723. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §4, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1787, which related to approval of prior transfers and extinguishment of Indian title and claims of Indians within the State of Maine, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1724. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §5, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1788, which related to the Maine Indian Claims Settlement and Land Acquisition Funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1725. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §6, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1793; Pub. L. 97–428, §3, Jan. 8, 1983, 96 Stat. 2268, which provided for applicability of State law, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1726. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §7, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1795, which related to the tribal organization of the Passamaquoddy Tribe, the Penobscot Nation, and the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1727. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §8, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1795, which provided for implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act in jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1728. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §9, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1795, which provided that payments to a tribe under this subchapter would not affect eligibility of the State for participation in Federal financial aid programs and that receipt of payments from the State would not affect eligibility of a tribe for Federal benefits, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1729. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §10, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1796; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, which related to capital gains on transfers of land, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1730. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §11, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1796, which related to transfer of tribal trust funds held by the State of Maine, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1731. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §12, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1796, which provided that this subchapter would constitute a general discharge and release of all obligations of the State of Maine arising from any treaty or agreement with any Indian tribe, except as expressly provided herein, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1732. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §13, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1797, which related to limitation of actions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1733. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §14, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1797, which authorized appropriations, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1734. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §15, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1797, which related to severability of provisions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

§1735. Omitted

Editorial Notes

Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §16, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1797, which related to construction of this subchapter and construction in the State of Maine of Federal laws enacted after Oct. 10, 1980, for the benefit of Indians, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.