SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER COMMODITIES
Part A—Dairy
§7251. Milk price support program
(a) Support activities
The Secretary of Agriculture shall support the price of milk produced in the 48 contiguous States through the purchase of cheese, butter, and nonfat dry milk produced from the milk.
(b) Rate
The price of milk shall be supported at the following rates per hundredweight for milk containing 3.67 percent butterfat:
(1) During calendar year 1996, $10.35.
(2) During calendar year 1997, $10.20.
(3) During calendar year 1998, $10.05.
(4) During each of calendar years 1999 through 2001, $9.90.
(5) During the period beginning on January 1, 2002, and ending on May 31, 2002, $9.90.
(c) Purchase prices
The support purchase prices under this section for each of the products of milk (butter, cheese, and nonfat dry milk) announced by the Secretary shall be the same for all of that product sold by persons offering to sell the product to the Secretary. The purchase prices shall be sufficient to enable plants of average efficiency to pay producers, on average, a price that is not less than the rate of price support for milk in effect under subsection (b).
(d) Special rule for butter and nonfat dry milk purchase prices
(1) Allocation of purchase prices
The Secretary may allocate the rate of price support between the purchase prices for nonfat dry milk and butter in a manner that will result in the lowest level of expenditures by the Commodity Credit Corporation or achieve such other objectives as the Secretary considers appropriate. Not later than 10 days after making or changing an allocation, the Secretary shall notify the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate of the allocation.
(2) Timing of purchase price adjustments
The Secretary may make any such adjustments in the purchase prices for nonfat dry milk and butter the Secretary considers to be necessary not more than twice in each calendar year.
(e) Refunds of 1995 and 1996 assessments
(1) Refund required
The Secretary shall provide for a refund of the entire reduction required under section 204(h)(2) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (
(2) Exception
This subsection shall not apply with respect to a producer for a particular calendar year if the producer has already received a refund under section 204(h) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 for the same fiscal year before the effective date of this section.
(3) Treatment of refund
A refund under this subsection shall not be considered as any type of price support or payment for purposes of
(f) Commodity Credit Corporation
The Secretary shall carry out the program authorized by this section through the Commodity Credit Corporation.
(g) Omitted
(h) Period of effectiveness
This section (other than subsection (g)) shall be effective only during the period beginning on the first day of the first month beginning after April 4, 1996, and ending on May 31, 2002. The program authorized by this section shall terminate on May 31, 2002, and shall be considered to have expired notwithstanding
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), (2), was classified to
Codification
Section is comprised of section 141 of
Amendments
2001—Subsec. (b)(5).
Subsec. (h).
2000—Subsec. (b)(4).
Subsec. (h).
1999—Subsec. (b)(4).
Subsec. (h).
§7252. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–76, title VII, §772(b), Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 745
Section,
§7253. Consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders
(a) Amendment of orders
(1) Required consolidation
The Secretary shall amend Federal milk marketing orders issued under
(2) Inclusion of California as separate order
Upon the petition and approval of California dairy producers in the manner provided in
(3) Related issues addressed in consolidation
Among the issues the Secretary is authorized to implement as part of the consolidation of Federal milk marketing orders are the following:
(A) The use of utilization rates and multiple basing points for the pricing of fluid milk.
(B) The use of uniform multiple component pricing when developing 1 or more basic formula prices for manufacturing milk.
(4) Effect of existing law
In implementing the consolidation of Federal milk marketing orders and related reforms under this subsection, the Secretary may not consider, or base any decision on, the table contained in
(b) Expedited process
(1) Use of informal rulemaking
To implement the consolidation of Federal milk marketing orders and related reforms under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use the notice and comment procedures provided in
(2) Time limitations
(A) Proposed amendments
The Secretary shall announce the proposed amendments to be made under subsection (a) not later than 2 years after April 4, 1996.
(B) Final amendments
The Secretary shall implement the amendments not later than 3 years after April 4, 1996.
(3) Effect of court order
The actions authorized by this subsection are intended to ensure the timely publication and implementation of new and amended Federal milk marketing orders. In the event that the Secretary is enjoined or otherwise restrained by a court order from publishing or implementing the consolidation and related reforms under subsection (a), the length of time for which that injunction or other restraining order is effective shall be added to the time limitations specified in paragraph (2) thereby extending those time limitations by a period of time equal to the period of time for which the injunction or other restraining order is effective.
(c) Failure to timely consolidate orders
If the Secretary fails to implement the consolidation required under subsection (a)(1) within the time period required under subsection (b)(2)(B) (plus any additional period provided under subsection (b)(3)), the Secretary may not assess or collect assessments from milk producers or handlers under such
(d) Report regarding further reforms
(1) Report required
Not later than April 1, 1997, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report—
(A) reviewing the Federal milk marketing order system established pursuant to
(B) describing the efforts underway and the progress made in implementing the reforms required by subsection (a); and
(C) containing such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for further improvements and reforms to the Federal milk marketing order system.
(2) Effect of other laws
Any limitation imposed by Act of Congress on the conduct or completion of reports to Congress shall not apply to the report required under this section, unless the limitation specifically refers to this section.
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2014—Subsec. (a)(2).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Use of Option 1A as Price Structure for Class I Milk Under Consolidated Federal Milk Marketing Orders
"(a)
"(b)
"(c)
"(d)
"(e)
"(1) The notice and hearing requirements of section 8c(3) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (
"(2) A referendum conducted by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to subsections (17) or (19) of section 8c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (
"(3) The Statement of Policy of the Secretary of Agriculture effective July 24, 1971 (36 Fed. Reg. 13804), relating to notices of proposed rulemaking and public participation in rulemaking.
"(4)
"(5) Any decision, restraining order, or injunction issued by a United States court before the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1999]."
Further Rulemaking To Develop Pricing Methods for Class III and Class IV Milk Under Marketing Orders
"(a)
"(b)
"(c)
"(d)
"(e)
"(f)
§7254. Effect on fluid milk standards in State of California
Nothing in this Act or any other provision of law shall be construed to preempt, prohibit, or otherwise limit the authority of the State of California, directly or indirectly, to establish or continue to effect any law, regulation, or requirement regarding—
(1) the percentage of milk solids or solids not fat in fluid milk products sold at retail or marketed in the State of California; or
(2) the labeling of such fluid milk products with regard to milk solids or solids not fat.
(
§7255. Milk manufacturing marketing adjustment
(a) Maximum allowances established
No State shall provide for a manufacturing allowance for the processing of milk in excess of—
(1) $1.65 per hundredweight of milk for milk manufactured into butter and nonfat dry milk; and
(2) $1.80 per hundredweight of milk for milk manufactured into cheese.
(b) "Manufacturing allowance" defined
In this section, the term "manufacturing allowance" means—
(1) the amount by which the product price value of butter and nonfat dry milk manufactured from a hundred pounds of milk containing 3.5 pounds of butterfat and 8.7 pounds of milk solids not fat resulting from a State's yield and product price formulas exceeds the class price for the milk used to produce those products; or
(2) the amount by which the product price value of cheese manufactured from a hundred pounds of milk containing 3.5 pounds of butterfat and 8.7 pounds of milk solids not fat resulting from a State's yield and product price formulas exceeds the class price for the milk used to produce cheese.
(c) Effect of violation
If the Secretary determines following a hearing that a State has in effect a manufacturing allowance that exceeds the manufacturing allowance authorized in subsection (a), the Secretary shall suspend purchases of cheddar cheese, butter, and nonfat dry milk produced in that State until such time as the State complies with such subsection.
(d) Effective date; implementation
This section (other than subsection (e) 1) shall be effective during the period beginning on the first day of the first month beginning after April 4, 1996, and ending on December 31, 1999. During that period, the Secretary may exercise the authority provided to the Secretary under this section without regard to the issuance of regulations intended to carry out this section.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section is comprised of section 145 of
1 See Codification note below.
§7256. Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact
Congress hereby consents to the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact entered into among the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont as specified in section 1(b) Senate 1 Joint Resolution 28 of the 104th Congress, as placed on the calendar of the Senate, subject to the following conditions:
(1) Finding of compelling public interest
Based upon a finding by the Secretary of a compelling public interest in the Compact region, the Secretary may grant the States that have ratified the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact, as of April 4, 1996, the authority to implement the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact.
(2) Limitation on manufacturing price
The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission shall not regulate Class II, Class III, or Class III–A milk used for manufacturing purposes or any other milk, other than Class I (fluid) milk, as defined by a Federal milk marketing order issued under
(3) Duration
Consent for the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact shall terminate on September 30, 2001.
(4) Additional States
Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia are the only additional States that may join the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact, individually or otherwise, if upon entry the State is contiguous to a participating State and if Congress consents to the entry of the State into the Compact after April 4, 1996.
(5) Compensation of Commodity Credit Corporation
Before the end of each fiscal year that a Compact price regulation is in effect, the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission shall compensate the Commodity Credit Corporation for the cost of any purchases of milk and milk products by the Corporation that result from the projected rate of increase in milk production for the fiscal year within the Compact region in excess of the projected national average rate of the increase in milk production, as determined by the Secretary.
(6) Milk marketing order Administrator
At the request of the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission, the Administrator of the applicable Federal milk marketing order issued under section 608c(5) 2 of this title shall provide technical assistance to the Compact Commission and be compensated for that assistance.
(7) Further conditions
The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission shall not prohibit or in any way limit the marketing in the Compact region of any milk or milk product produced in any other production area in the United States. The Compact Commission shall respect and abide by the ongoing procedures between Federal milk marketing orders with respect to the sharing of proceeds from sales within the Compact region of bulk milk, packaged milk, or producer milk originating from outside of the Compact region. The Compact Commission shall not use compensatory payments under section 10(6) of the Compact as a barrier to the entry of milk into the Compact region or for any other purpose. Establishment of a Compact over-order price, in itself, shall not be considered a compensatory payment or a limitation or prohibition on the marketing of milk.
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Amendments
1999—Par. (3).
1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "of".
2 See References in Text note below.
§7257. Authority to assist in establishment and maintenance of one or more export trading companies
The Secretary of Agriculture shall, consistent with the obligations of the United States as a member of the World Trade Organization, provide such advice and assistance to the United States dairy industry as may be necessary to enable that industry to establish and maintain one or more export trading companies under the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Export Trading Company Act of 1982, referred to in text, is title I of
§7258. Standby authority to indicate entity best suited to provide international market development and export services
(a) Indication of entity best suited to assist international market development for and export of United States dairy products
The Secretary of Agriculture shall indicate which entity or entities autonomous of the Government of the United States, which seeks such a designation, is best suited to facilitate the international market development for and exportation of United States dairy products, if the Secretary determines that—
(1) the United States dairy industry has not established an export trading company under the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (
(2) the quantity of exports of United States dairy products during the 12-month period preceding July 1, 1998 does not exceed the quantity of exports of United States dairy products during the 12-month period preceding July 1, 1997 by 1.5 billion pounds (milk equivalent, total solids basis).
(b) Funding of export activities
The Secretary shall assist the entity or entities identified under subsection (a) in identifying sources of funding for the activities specified in subsection (a) from within the dairy industry and elsewhere.
(c) Application of section
This section shall apply only during the period beginning on July 1, 1997 and ending on September 30, 2000.
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Export Trading Company Act of 1982, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is title I of
§7259. Study and report regarding potential impact of Uruguay Round on prices, income, and government purchases
(a) Study
The Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct a study, on a variety by variety of cheese basis, to determine the potential impact on milk prices in the United States, dairy producer income, and Federal dairy program costs, of the allocation of additional cheese granted access to the United States as a result of the obligations of the United States as a member of the World Trade Organization.
(b) Report
Not later than June 30, 1997, the Secretary shall report to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives the results of the study conducted under this section.
(c) Rule of construction
Any limitation imposed by Act of Congress on the conduct or completion of studies or reports to Congress shall not apply to the study and report required under this section, unless the limitation specifically refers to this section.
(
Part B—Sugar
§7271. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1310(a)(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 182
Section,
§7272. Sugar program
(a) Sugarcane
The Secretary shall make loans available to processors of domestically grown sugarcane at a rate equal to—
(1) 18.00 cents per pound for raw cane sugar for the 2008 crop year;
(2) 18.25 cents per pound for raw cane sugar for the 2009 crop year;
(3) 18.50 cents per pound for raw cane sugar for the 2010 crop year;
(4) 18.75 cents per pound for raw cane sugar for each of the 2011 through 2018 crop years; and
(5) 19.75 cents per pound for raw cane sugar for each of the 2019 through 2023 crop years.
(b) Sugar beets
The Secretary shall make loans available to processors of domestically grown sugar beets at a rate equal to—
(1) 22.9 cents per pound for refined beet sugar for the 2008 crop year; and
(2) a rate that is equal to 128.5 percent of the loan rate per pound of raw cane sugar for the applicable crop year under subsection (a) for each of the 2009 through 2023 crop years.
(c) Term of loans
(1) In general
A loan under this section during any fiscal year shall be made available not earlier than the beginning of the fiscal year and shall mature at the earlier of—
(A) the end of the 9-month period beginning on the first day of the first month after the month in which the loan is made; or
(B) the end of the fiscal year in which the loan is made.
(2) Supplemental loans
In the case of a loan made under this section in the last 3 months of a fiscal year, the processor may repledge the sugar as collateral for a second loan in the subsequent fiscal year, except that the second loan shall—
(A) be made at the loan rate in effect at the time the first loan was made; and
(B) mature in 9 months less the quantity of time that the first loan was in effect.
(d) Loan type; processor assurances
(1) Nonrecourse loans
The Secretary shall carry out this section through the use of nonrecourse loans.
(2) Processor assurances
(A) In general
The Secretary shall obtain from each processor that receives a loan under this section such assurances as the Secretary considers adequate to ensure that the processor will provide payments to producers that are proportional to the value of the loan received by the processor for the sugar beets and sugarcane delivered by producers to the processor.
(B) Minimum payments
(i) In general
Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary may establish appropriate minimum payments for purposes of this paragraph.
(ii) Limitation
In the case of sugar beets, the minimum payment established under clause (i) shall not exceed the rate of payment provided for under the applicable contract between a sugar beet producer and a sugar beet processor.
(3) Administration
The Secretary may not impose or enforce any prenotification requirement, or similar administrative requirement not otherwise in effect on May 13, 2002, that has the effect of preventing a processor from electing to forfeit the loan collateral (of an acceptable grade and quality) on the maturity of the loan.
(e) Loans for in-process sugar
(1) Definition of in-process sugars and syrups
In this subsection, the term "in-process sugars and syrups" does not include raw sugar, liquid sugar, invert sugar, invert syrup, or other finished product that is otherwise eligible for a loan under subsection (a) or (b).
(2) Availability
The Secretary shall make nonrecourse loans available to processors of a crop of domestically grown sugarcane and sugar beets for in-process sugars and syrups derived from the crop.
(3) Loan rate
The loan rate shall be equal to 80 percent of the loan rate applicable to raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar, as determined by the Secretary on the basis of the source material for the in-process sugars and syrups.
(4) Further processing on forfeiture
(A) In general
As a condition of the forfeiture of in-process sugars and syrups serving as collateral for a loan under paragraph (2), the processor shall, within such reasonable time period as the Secretary may prescribe and at no cost to the Commodity Credit Corporation, convert the in-process sugars and syrups into raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar of acceptable grade and quality for sugars eligible for loans under subsection (a) or (b).
(B) Transfer to corporation
Once the in-process sugars and syrups are fully processed into raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar, the processor shall transfer the sugar to the Commodity Credit Corporation.
(C) Payment to processor
On transfer of the sugar, the Secretary shall make a payment to the processor in an amount equal to the amount obtained by multiplying—
(i) the difference between—
(I) the loan rate for raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar, as appropriate; and
(II) the loan rate the processor received under paragraph (3); by
(ii) the quantity of sugar transferred to the Secretary.
(5) Loan conversion
If the processor does not forfeit the collateral as described in paragraph (4), but instead further processes the in-process sugars and syrups into raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar and repays the loan on the in-process sugars and syrups, the processor may obtain a loan under subsection (a) or (b) for the raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar, as appropriate.
(6) Term of loan
The term of a loan made under this subsection for a quantity of in-process sugars and syrups, when combined with the term of a loan made with respect to the raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar derived from the in-process sugars and syrups, may not exceed 9 months, consistent with subsection (c).
(f) Avoiding forfeitures; Corporation inventory disposition
(1) In general
Subject to subsection (d)(3), to the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall operate the program established under this section at no cost to the Federal Government by avoiding the forfeiture of sugar to the Commodity Credit Corporation.
(2) Inventory disposition
(A) In general
To carry out paragraph (1), the Commodity Credit Corporation may accept bids to obtain raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar in the inventory of the Commodity Credit Corporation from (or otherwise make available such commodities, on appropriate terms and conditions, to) processors of sugarcane and processors of sugar beets (acting in conjunction with the producers of the sugarcane or sugar beets processed by the processors) in return for the reduction of production of raw cane sugar or refined beet sugar, as appropriate.
(B) Bioenergy feedstock
If a reduction in the quantity of production accepted under subparagraph (A) involves sugar beets or sugarcane that has already been planted, the sugar beets or sugarcane so planted may not be used for any commercial purpose other than as a bioenergy feedstock.
(C) Additional authority
The authority provided under this paragraph is in addition to any authority of the Commodity Credit Corporation under any other law.
(g) Information reporting
(1) Duty of processors and refiners to report
A sugarcane processor, cane sugar refiner, and sugar beet processor shall furnish the Secretary, on a monthly basis, such information as the Secretary may require to administer sugar programs, including the quantity of purchases of sugarcane, sugar beets, and sugar, and production, importation, distribution, and stock levels of sugar.
(2) Duty of producers to report
(A) Proportionate share States
As a condition of a loan made to a processor for the benefit of a producer, the Secretary shall require each producer of sugarcane located in a State (other than the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) in which there are in excess of 250 producers of sugarcane to report, in the manner prescribed by the Secretary, the sugarcane yields and acres planted to sugarcane of the producer.
(B) Other States
The Secretary may require each producer of sugarcane or sugar beets not covered by subparagraph (A) to report, in a manner prescribed by the Secretary, the yields of, and acres planted to, sugarcane or sugar beets, respectively, of the producer.
(3) Duty of importers to report
(A) In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall require an importer of sugars, syrups, or molasses to be used for human consumption or to be used for the extraction of sugar for human consumption to report, in the manner prescribed by the Secretary, the quantities of the products imported by the importer and the sugar content or equivalent of the products.
(B) Tariff-rate quotas
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to sugars, syrups, or molasses that are within the quantities of tariff-rate quotas that are subject to the lower rate of duties.
(4) Collection of information on Mexico
(A) Collection
The Secretary shall collect—
(i) information on the production, consumption, stocks, and trade of sugar in Mexico, including United States exports of sugar to Mexico; and
(ii) publicly available information on Mexican production, consumption, and trade of high fructose corn syrups.
(B) Publication
The data collected under subparagraph (A) shall be published in each edition of the World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates.
(5) Penalty
Any person willfully failing or refusing to furnish the information required to be reported by paragraph (1), (2), or (3), or furnishing willfully false information, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each such violation.
(6) Monthly reports
Taking into consideration the information received under this subsection, the Secretary shall publish on a monthly basis composite data on production, imports, distribution, and stock levels of sugar.
(h) Substitution of refined sugar
For purposes of Additional U.S. Note 6 to
(i) Effective period
This section shall be effective only for the 2008 through 2023 crops of sugar beets and sugarcane.
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, referred to in subsec. (h), is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under
Codification
Provisions of law applicable to sugarcane or sugar beets for the 2023 crop year pursuant to title I of
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (a)(5).
Subsec. (b)(2).
Subsec. (i).
2014—Subsec. (a)(3)–(5).
Subsec. (b)(2).
Subsec. (i).
2008—
2002—
2000—Subsec. (e)(1).
Subsec. (e)(2), (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2008 Amendment
Amendment of this section and repeal of
Effective Date of Assessment Termination
Regulations
Loans for 2007 Crop Year
[