§1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between-
(1) citizens of different States;
(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State;
(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and
(4) a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.
(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where the plaintiff who files the case originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $75,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff.
(c) For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title-
(1) a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of business, except that in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of-
(A) every State and foreign state of which the insured is a citizen;
(B) every State and foreign state by which the insurer has been incorporated; and
(C) the State or foreign state where the insurer has its principal place of business; and
(2) the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent, and the legal representative of an infant or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the infant or incompetent.
(d)(1) In this subsection-
(A) the term "class" means all of the class members in a class action;
(B) the term "class action" means any civil action filed under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative persons as a class action;
(C) the term "class certification order" means an order issued by a court approving the treatment of some or all aspects of a civil action as a class action; and
(D) the term "class members" means the persons (named or unnamed) who fall within the definition of the proposed or certified class in a class action.
(2) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is a class action in which-
(A) any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State different from any defendant;
(B) any member of a class of plaintiffs is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a State; or
(C) any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state.
(3) A district court may, in the interests of justice and looking at the totality of the circumstances, decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2) over a class action in which greater than one-third but less than two-thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate and the primary defendants are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed based on consideration of-
(A) whether the claims asserted involve matters of national or interstate interest;
(B) whether the claims asserted will be governed by laws of the State in which the action was originally filed or by the laws of other States;
(C) whether the class action has been pleaded in a manner that seeks to avoid Federal jurisdiction;
(D) whether the action was brought in a forum with a distinct nexus with the class members, the alleged harm, or the defendants;
(E) whether the number of citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed in all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate is substantially larger than the number of citizens from any other State, and the citizenship of the other members of the proposed class is dispersed among a substantial number of States; and
(F) whether, during the 3-year period preceding the filing of that class action, 1 or more other class actions asserting the same or similar claims on behalf of the same or other persons have been filed.
(4) A district court shall decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2)-
(A)(i) over a class action in which-
(I) greater than two-thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed;
(II) at least 1 defendant is a defendant-
(aa) from whom significant relief is sought by members of the plaintiff class;
(bb) whose alleged conduct forms a significant basis for the claims asserted by the proposed plaintiff class; and
(cc) who is a citizen of the State in which the action was originally filed; and
(III) principal injuries resulting from the alleged conduct or any related conduct of each defendant were incurred in the State in which the action was originally filed; and
(ii) during the 3-year period preceding the filing of that class action, no other class action has been filed asserting the same or similar factual allegations against any of the defendants on behalf of the same or other persons; or
(B) two-thirds or more of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate, and the primary defendants, are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed.
(5) Paragraphs (2) through (4) shall not apply to any class action in which-
(A) the primary defendants are States, State officials, or other governmental entities against whom the district court may be foreclosed from ordering relief; or
(B) the number of members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate is less than 100.
(6) In any class action, the claims of the individual class members shall be aggregated to determine whether the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
(7) Citizenship of the members of the proposed plaintiff classes shall be determined for purposes of paragraphs (2) through (6) as of the date of filing of the complaint or amended complaint, or, if the case stated by the initial pleading is not subject to Federal jurisdiction, as of the date of service by plaintiffs of an amended pleading, motion, or other paper, indicating the existence of Federal jurisdiction.
(8) This subsection shall apply to any class action before or after the entry of a class certification order by the court with respect to that action.
(9) Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any class action that solely involves a claim-
(A) concerning a covered security as defined under 16(f)(3) 1 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 78p(f)(3) 2) and section 28(f)(5)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78bb(f)(5)(E));
(B) that relates to the internal affairs or governance of a corporation or other form of business enterprise and that arises under or by virtue of the laws of the State in which such corporation or business enterprise is incorporated or organized; or
(C) that relates to the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties), and obligations relating to or created by or pursuant to any security (as defined under section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)) and the regulations issued thereunder).
(10) For purposes of this subsection and section 1453, an unincorporated association shall be deemed to be a citizen of the State where it has its principal place of business and the State under whose laws it is organized.
(11)(A) For purposes of this subsection and section 1453, a mass action shall be deemed to be a class action removable under paragraphs (2) through (10) if it otherwise meets the provisions of those paragraphs.
(B)(i) As used in subparagraph (A), the term "mass action" means any civil action (except a civil action within the scope of section 1711(2)) in which monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs' claims involve common questions of law or fact, except that jurisdiction shall exist only over those plaintiffs whose claims in a mass action satisfy the jurisdictional amount requirements under subsection (a).
(ii) As used in subparagraph (A), the term "mass action" shall not include any civil action in which-
(I) all of the claims in the action arise from an event or occurrence in the State in which the action was filed, and that allegedly resulted in injuries in that State or in States contiguous to that State;
(II) the claims are joined upon motion of a defendant;
(III) all of the claims in the action are asserted on behalf of the general public (and not on behalf of individual claimants or members of a purported class) pursuant to a State statute specifically authorizing such action; or
(IV) the claims have been consolidated or coordinated solely for pretrial proceedings.
(C)(i) Any action(s) removed to Federal court pursuant to this subsection shall not thereafter be transferred to any other court pursuant to section 1407, or the rules promulgated thereunder, unless a majority of the plaintiffs in the action request transfer pursuant to section 1407.
(ii) This subparagraph will not apply-
(I) to cases certified pursuant to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; or
(II) if plaintiffs propose that the action proceed as a class action pursuant to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(D) The limitations periods on any claims asserted in a mass action that is removed to Federal court pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed tolled during the period that the action is pending in Federal court.
(e) The word "States", as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
Other provisions of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 1331, 1341, 1342, 1345, 1354, and 1359 of this title. (See reviser's notes under said sections.)
Jurisdiction conferred by other sections of this chapter, except section 1335, is not dependent upon diversity of citizenship. (See annotations under former section 41 of title 28, U.S.C.A., and 35 C.J.S., p. 833 et seq. §§30–43. See, also, reviser's note under section 1331 of this title.) As to citizenship of bank where jurisdiction depends upon diversity of citizenship, see section 1348 of this title.
Words "all civil actions" were substituted for "all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity" in order to conform to Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "or citizens of the District of Columbia, Territory of Hawaii, or Alaska, and any State or Territory" which were inserted by the amendatory act April 20, 1940, are omitted. The word "States" is defined in this section and enumeration of the references is unnecessary.
The revised section conforms with the views of Philip F. Herrick, United States Attorney, Puerto Rico, who observed that the act of April 20, 1940, permitted action between a citizen of Hawaii and of Puerto Rico, but not between a citizen of New York and Puerto Rico, in the district court.
This changes the law to insure uniformity. The 1940 amendment applied only to the provision as to controversies between "citizens of different States." The new definition in subsection (b) extends the 1940 amendment to apply to controversies between citizens of the Territories or the District of Columbia, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof.
The diversity of citizenship language of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as amended in 1940, was described as ambiguous in McGarry v. City of Bethlehem, 45 F.Supp. 385, 386. In that case the 1940 amendment was held unconstitutional insofar as it affected the District of Columbia. However, two other district courts upheld the amendment. Winkler v. Daniels, D.C.Va. 1942, 43 F.Supp. 265; Glaeser v. Acacia Mutual Life Ass'n., D.C.Cal. 1944, 55 F.Supp. 925.
This section is intended to cover all diversity of citizenship instances in civil actions in accordance with the judicial construction of the language in the original section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Therefore, the revised language covers civil actions between-
Citizens of a State, and citizens of other States and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof;
Citizens of a Territory or the District of Columbia, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof;
Citizens of different States;
Citizens of different Territories;
Citizens of a State, and citizens of Territories;
Citizens of a State or Territory, and citizens of the District of Columbia;
Citizens of a State, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof.
The revised section removes an uncertainty referred to in the McGarry case, supra, as to whether Congress intended to permit citizens of the Territories or the District of Columbia to sue a State or Territory itself rather than the citizens thereof. The court observed that "Congress could hardly have had such intention."
The sentence "The foregoing provisions as to the sum or value of the matter in controversy shall not be construed to apply to any of the cases mentioned in the succeeding paragraphs of this section" was omitted as unnecessary. Those paragraphs are (2)–(28) of said section 41 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which are revised and incorporated in this chapter and, except for those relating to actions against the United States and interpleader, contains no provision as to a sum or value necessary to confer jurisdiction. Consequently the omitted sentence is covered by excluding such requirement.
Section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as originally enacted, purported to include all jurisdictional provisions relating to the district courts. Subsequently, many special jurisdictional provisions were enacted and incorporated in other titles of the U.S.C., 1940 ed., as follows:
| Title | Section |
|---|---|
| 7 | 209 |
| 7 | 210 |
| 7 | 216 |
| 7 | 292 |
| 7 | 499g |
| 7 | 608a(6) |
| 7 | 608c(15)(B) |
| 7 | 610(b)(2) |
| 7 | 648 |
| 7 | 1175 |
| 7 | 1365-1367 |
| 7 | 1376 |
| 7 | 1508(c) |
| 8 | 164 |
| 8 | 701 |
| 8 | 903 |
| 9 | 4 |
| 9 | 8 |
| 9 | 9 |
| 11 | 11(a) |
| 11 | 46 |
| 11 | 205(a), (l) |
| 11 | 401 |
| 11 | 511 |
| 11 | 512 |
| 11 | 514-516 |
| 11 | 711 |
| 11 | 712 |
| 11 | 811 |
| 11 | 812 |
| 11 | 1011 |
| 11 | 1012 |
| 11 | 1013 |
| 11 | 1200 |
| 12 | 93 |
| 12 | 195 |
| 12 | 632 |
| 15 | 4 |
| 15 | 9 |
| 15 | 15 |
| 15 | 25 |
| 15 | 26 |
| 15 | 31 |
| 15 | 53 |
| 15 | 68e |
| 15 | 77t |
| 15 | 77v |
| 15 | 77vvv |
| 15 | 78u(e) |
| 15 | 78u(f) |
| 15 | 78aa |
| 15 | 79k(d), (e) |
| 15 | 79r(f), (g) |
| 15 | 80a–25 |
| 15 | 80a–34 |
| 15 | 80a–35 |
| 15 | 80a–41(c), (e) |
| 15 | 80a–43 |
| 15 | 80b–14 |
| 15 | 97 |
| 15 | 99 |
| 15 | 433 |
| 15 | 715d(c) |
| 15 | 715i |
| 15 | 717s |
| 15 | 717u |
| 16 | 10 |
| 16 | 583e |
| 16 | 820 |
| 16 | 825m |
| 16 | 825n |
| 16 | 825p |
| 17 | 26 |
| 17 | 34 |
| 21 | 193 |
| 21 | 332 |
| 21 | 355 |
| 25 | 314 |
| 25 | 345 |
| 26 | 3633 |
| 26 | 3800 |
| 27 | 207 |
| 29 | 101 |
| 29 | 103-109 |
| 29 | 160(e) |
| 29 | 216 |
| 29 | 217 |
| 30 | 188 |
| 31 | 232 |
| 33 | 495 |
| 33 | 918 |
| 33 | 921 |
| 35 | 63 |
| 35 | 66 |
| 35 | 67 |
| 35 | 72a |
| 35 | 90 |
| 38 | 445 |
| 40 | 257 |
| 40 | 270b |
| 40 | 361 |
| 41 | 113(b)(2) |
| 42 | 405(c)(5), (g) |
| 43 | 546 |
| 43 | 1062 |
| 45 | 56 |
| 45 | 88 |
| 45 | 89 |
| 45 | 153(p) |
| 45 | 159 |
| 45 | 185 |
| 45 | 228j(b)4 |
| 45 | 228k |
| 45 | 268 |
| 45 | 355(f) |
| 46 | 597 |
| 46 | 688 |
| 46 | 711 |
| 46 | 741 et seq. |
| 46 | 781 et seq. |
| 46 | 941(c) |
| 46 | 951 |
| 46 | 954 |
| 46 | 1114(c) |
| 46 | 1128d |
| 47 | 11 |
| 47 | 13 |
| 47 | 33 |
| 47 | 36 |
| 47 | 207 |
| 47 | 401 |
| 47 | 406 |
| 47 | 407 |
| 48 | 242 |
| 48 | 245 |
| 49 | 5(8) |
| 49 | 9 |
| 49 | 16(2) |
| 49 | 16(9) |
| 49 | 16(12) |
| 49 | 17(9) |
| 49 | 19a(l) |
| 49 | 20(9) |
| 49 | 23 |
| 49 | 26(h) |
| 49 | 41(1), (3) |
| 49 | 43 |
| 49 | 181(b), (c) |
| 49 | 305(g) |
| 49 | 322(b) |
| 49 | 647 |
| 49 | 916 |
| 49 | 1017 |
| 49 | 1021 |
| 50 | 23 |
| D.C. Code | 11–305-11–307 |
| D.C. Code | 11–309 |
| D.C. Code | 11–324 |
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (d)(1)(B), (11)(C)(ii), is set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2011-Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (a)(2).
Subsec. (c)(1).
2005-Subsecs. (d), (e).
1996-Subsecs. (a), (b).
1988-Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c).
1976-Subsec. (a)(2).
Subsec. (a)(3).
Subsec. (a)(4).
1964-Subsec. (c).
1958-
Subsec. (a).
Subsecs. (b) to (d).
1956-Subsec. (b). Act July 26, 1956, included the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
"(a)
"(b)
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1964 Amendment
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Amendment by