CHAPTER 15B —GREAT LAKES FISH AND WILDLIFE RESTORATION
§941. Findings
Congress finds that—
(1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife communities that are structurally and functionally changing;
(2) successful fish and wildlife management focuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effective management requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners;
(3) additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats on which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and
(4) this chapter allows Federal agencies, States, and Indian tribes to work in an effective partnership by providing the funding for restoration work.
(
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 941,
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title of 2022 Amendment
Short Title of 2006 Amendment
Short Title of 1998 Amendment
Short Title
Continued Monitoring and Assessment of Study Findings and Recommendations
Congressional Findings
"(1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife communities that are structurally and functionally changing;
"(2) successful fish and wildlife management focuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effective management requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners;
"(3) it is in the national interest to undertake activities in the Great Lakes Basin that support sustainable fish and wildlife resources of common concern provided under the recommendations of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration authorized under Executive Order 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043; relating to the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force) [
"(4) additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats upon which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin;
"(5) as of the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 11, 2006], actions are not funded that are considered essential to meet the goals and objectives in managing the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats upon which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and
"(6) the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act [of 1990] (
"(1) the Great Lakes Fishery Resources Restoration Study, for which a report was submitted to Congress in 1995, was a comprehensive study of the status, and the assessment, management, and restoration needs, of the fishery resources of the Great Lakes Basin, and was conducted through the joint effort of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, State fish and wildlife resource management agencies, Indian tribes, and the Great Lakes Fishery Commission; and
"(2) the study—
"(A) found that, although State, Provincial, Native American Tribal, and Federal agencies have made significant progress toward the goal of restoring a healthy fish community to the Great Lakes Basin, additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fisheries and related resources in the Great Lakes Basin; and
"(B) recommended actions that are not currently funded but are considered essential to meet goals and objectives in managing the resources of the Great Lakes Basin."
§941a. Purpose
The purposes of this chapter are—
(1) to develop and implement proposals for the restoration of fish and wildlife resources in the Great Lakes Basin; and
(2) to provide assistance to the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, States, Indian Tribes, and other interested entities to encourage cooperative conservation, restoration and management of the fish and wildlife resources and their habitat in the Great Lakes Basin.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
1998—
Par. (1).
Pars. (2), (3).
1996—
§941b. Definitions
In this chapter—
(1) the term "Committee" means the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Proposal Review Committee established by
(2) the term "Director" means the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service;
(3) the term "Great Lakes Basin" means the air, land, water, and living organisms within the drainage basin of the Saint Lawrence River at or upstream from the point at which the river becomes the international boundary between Canada and the United States;
(4) the term "Indian Tribe" means any Indian tribe, band, village, nation, or other organized group or community that is recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians, and that has Great Lakes fish and wildlife management authority in the Great Lakes Basin;
(5) the term "lower Great Lakes" means the region in which is located that portion of the Great Lakes Basin which is downstream from the confluence of the Saint Clair River and Lake Huron near Port Huron, Michigan;
(6) the term "non-Federal source" includes a State government, local government, Indian tribe, other non-Federal governmental entity, private entity, and individual;
(7) the term "nonindigenous species" means a species of plant, animal, or other organism that did not occur in the Great Lakes Basin before European colonization of North America;
(8) the term "regional project" means authorized activities of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to fish and wildlife resource protection, restoration, maintenance, and enhancement impacting multiple States or Indian Tribes with fish and wildlife management authority in the Great Lakes basin;
(9) the term "Report" means the United States Fish and Wildlife Service report entitled "Great Lakes Fishery Resources Restoration Study", submitted to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on September 13, 1995;
(10) the term "restoration" means rehabilitation and maintenance of the structure, function, diversity, and dynamics of a biological system, including reestablishment of self-sustaining populations of fish and wildlife;
(11) the term "State Director" means the head of the agency, department, board, commission, or other governmental entity of each of the States of New York, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania which is responsible for the management and conservation of the fish and wildlife resources of that State; and
(12) the term "upper Great Lakes" means that portion of the Great Lakes Basin which is upstream from the confluence of the Saint Clair River and Lake Huron near Port Huron, Michigan.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
2006—Pars. (1) to (3).
Par. (4).
Pars. (5) to (7).
Par. (8).
Pars. (9) to (14).
1998—
Pars. (2) to (7).
Par. (8).
Par. (9).
Pars. (10), (11).
Par. (12).
Par. (13).
Par. (14).
1996—
§941c. Identification, review, and implementation of proposals and regional projects
(a) In general
Subject to subsection (b)(2), the Director—
(1) shall encourage the development and, subject to the availability of appropriations, the implementation of fish and wildlife restoration proposals and regional projects based on the results of the Report; and
(2) in cooperation with the State Directors and Indian Tribes, shall identify, develop, and, subject to the availability of appropriations, implement regional projects in the Great Lakes Basin to be administered by Director in accordance with this section.
(b) Identification of proposals and regional projects
(1) Request by the Director
The Director shall annually request that State Directors and Indian Tribes, in cooperation or partnership with other interested entities and in accordance with subsection (a), submit proposals or regional projects for the restoration of fish and wildlife resources.
(2) Requirements for proposals and regional projects
A proposal or regional project under paragraph (1) shall be—
(A) submitted in the manner and form prescribed by the Director; and
(B) consistent with—
(i) the goals of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as amended;
(ii) the 1954 Great Lakes Fisheries Convention;
(iii) the 1980 Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries, as revised in 1997, and Fish Community Objectives for each Great Lake and connecting water as established under the Joint Strategic Plan;
(iv) the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (
(v) the North American Waterfowl Management Plan and joint ventures established under the plan;
(vi) the strategies outlined through the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration authorized under Executive Order 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043; relating to the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force);
(vii) the strategic action plan of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative; and
(viii) each applicable State wildlife action plan.
(3) Sea lamprey authority
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission shall retain authority and responsibility to formulate and implement a comprehensive program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes Basin.
(c) Review of proposals
(1) Establishment of Committee
There is established the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Proposal Review Committee, which shall operate under the guidance of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
(2) Membership and appointment
(A) In general
The Committee shall consist of 2 representatives of each of the State Directors and Indian Tribes, of whom—
(i) 1 representative shall be the individual appointed by the State Director or Indian Tribe to the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission; and
(ii) 1 representative shall have expertise in wildlife management.
(B) Appointments
Each representative shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing State Director or Tribal Chair.
(C) Observer
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall participate as an observer of the Committee.
(D) Recusal
A member of the Committee shall recuse himself or herself from consideration of proposals that the member, or the entity that the member represents, has submitted.
(3) Functions
The Committee shall—
(A) meet at least annually;
(B) review proposals and regional projects developed in accordance with subsection (b) to assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposals and regional projects in fulfilling the purposes of this chapter; and
(C) recommend to the Director any of those proposals and regional projects that should be funded and implemented under this section.
(d) Implementation of proposals and regional projects
(1) In general
After considering recommendations of the Committee and the goals specified in
(A) select proposals and regional projects to be implemented; and
(B) subject to the availability of appropriations and subsection (e), fund implementation of the proposals and regional projects.
(2) Selection criteria
In selecting and funding proposals and regional projects, the Director shall take into account the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposals and regional projects in fulfilling the purposes of other laws applicable to restoration of the fish and wildlife resources and habitat of the Great Lakes Basin.
(e) Cost sharing
(1) In general
(A) Non-Federal share
Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project selected under subsection (d) (excluding the cost of establishing sea lamprey barriers) shall be paid in cash or in-kind contributions by non-Federal sources.
(B) Time period for providing match
The non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under subparagraph (A) may be provided at any time during the 2-year period preceding January 1 of the year in which the Director receives the application for the proposal or regional project.
(2) Authorized sources of non-Federal share
(A) In general
The Director may determine the non-Federal share under paragraph (1) by taking into account—
(i) the appraised value of land or a conservation easement as described in subparagraph (B); or
(ii) as described in subparagraph (C), the costs associated with—
(I) securing a conservation easement; and
(II) restoration or enhancement of the conservation easement.
(B) Appraisal of conservation easement
(i) In general
The value of a conservation easement may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under paragraph (1)(A) if the Director determines that the conservation easement—
(I) meets the requirements of subsection (b)(2);
(II) is acquired before the end of the grant period of the proposal or regional project;
(III) is held in perpetuity for the conservation purposes of the programs of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to the Great Lakes Basin, as described in
(IV) is connected either physically or through a conservation planning process to the proposal or regional project; and
(V) is appraised in accordance with clause (ii).
(ii) Appraisal
With respect to the appraisal of a conservation easement described in clause (i)—
(I) the appraisal valuation date shall be not later than 1 year after the price of the conservation easement was set under a contract; and
(II) the appraisal shall—
(aa) conform to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP); and
(bb) be completed by a Federal- or State-certified appraiser.
(C) Costs of securing conservation easements
(i) In general
All costs associated with securing a conservation easement and restoration or enhancement of that conservation easement may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under paragraph (1)(A) if the activities and expenses associated with securing the conservation easement and restoration or enhancement of that conservation easement meet the requirements of subparagraph (B)(i).
(ii) Inclusion
The costs referred to in clause (i) may include cash, in-kind contributions, and indirect costs.
(iii) Exclusion
The costs referred to in clause (i) may not be costs associated with mitigation or litigation (other than costs associated with the Natural Resource Damage Assessment program).
(3) Regional projects
Regional projects selected under subsection (d) shall be exempt from cost sharing if the Director determines that the authorization for the project does not require a non-Federal cost-share.
(4) Exclusion of Federal funds from non-Federal share
The Director may not consider the expenditure, directly or indirectly, of Federal funds received by any entity to be a contribution by a non-Federal source for purposes of this subsection.
(5) Effect on certain Indian tribes
Nothing in this subsection affects an Indian tribe affected by an alternative applicable cost sharing requirement under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(B)(iv), is title I of
Executive Order 13340, referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(B)(vi), is Ex. Ord. No. 13340, May 18, 2004, 69 F.R. 29043, which is set out as a note under
The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (e)(5), is
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (b)(2)(B)(vii), (viii).
Subsec. (c)(2)(C).
Subsec. (e)(1).
Subsec. (e)(2) to (5).
2006—
1998—
1996—
1 See References in Text note below.
§941d. Goals of United States Fish and Wildlife Service programs related to Great Lakes fish and wildlife resources
In administering programs of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to the Great Lakes Basin, the Director shall seek to achieve the following goals:
(1) Restoring and maintaining self-sustaining fish and wildlife resources.
(2) Minimizing the impacts of contaminants on fishery and wildlife resources.
(3) Protecting, maintaining, and, where degraded and destroyed, restoring fish and wildlife habitat, including the enhancement and creation of wetlands that result in a net gain in the amount of those habitats.
(4) Stopping illegal activities adversely impacting fishery and wildlife resources.
(5) Restoring threatened and endangered species to viable, self-sustaining levels.
(6) Protecting, managing, and conserving migratory birds.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
2006—Par. (1).
1996—
§941e. Establishment of offices
(a) Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office
(1) In general
The Director shall establish an office with necessary administrative and technical support services to carry out all United States Fish and Wildlife Service operational activities related to fishery resource protection, restoration, maintenance, and enhancement in the lower Great Lakes.
(2) Name and location
The office shall be known as the "Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office", and shall be centrally located in the lower Great Lakes so as to facilitate fishery resource restoration and enhancement activities relating to the lower Great Lakes.
(3) Responsibilities
The responsibilities of the Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office shall include operational activities of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to fishery resource protection, restoration, maintenance, and enhancement in the Lower Great Lakes.
(b) Upper Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Offices
(1) In general
The Director shall establish one or more offices with necessary administrative and technical support services to carry out United States Fish and Wildlife Service operational activities related to fishery resource protection, restoration, maintenance, and enhancement in the upper Great Lakes.
(2) Name and location
Each of the offices shall be known as an "Upper Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office", and shall be appropriately located so as to facilitate fishery resource activities in the upper Great Lakes.
(3) Responsibilities
The responsibilities of the Upper Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Offices shall include operational activities of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to fishery resource protection, restoration, maintenance, and enhancement in the Upper Great Lakes.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c).
2006—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c).
1996—
§941f. Reports
(a) In general
Not later than December 31, 2021, and not later than December 31, 2027, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that describes, with respect to the period covered by the report—
(1) actions taken to solicit and review proposals under
(2) the results of proposals implemented under
(3) progress toward the accomplishment of the goals specified in
(b) Public access to data
For each of fiscal years 2023 through 2028, the Director shall make available through a public access website of the Department information that describes—
(1) actions taken to solicit and review proposals under
(2) the results of proposals implemented under
(3) progress toward the accomplishment of the goals specified in
(4) the priorities proposed for funding in the annual budget process under this chapter; and
(5) actions taken in support of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan based on the recommendations of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration authorized under Executive Order 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043; relating to the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force).
(c) Continued monitoring and assessment of study findings and recommendations
The Director—
(1) shall continue to monitor the status, and the assessment, management, and restoration needs, of the fish and wildlife resources of the Great Lakes Basin; and
(2) may reassess and update, as necessary, the findings and recommendations of the Report.
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Executive Order 13340, referred to in subsec. (b)(5), is Ex. Ord. No. 13340, May 18, 2004, 69 F.R. 29043, which is set out as a note under
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
2016—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (b)(5).
Subsec. (c).
2006—
"(1) actions taken to solicit and review proposals under
"(2) the results of proposals implemented under
"(3) progress toward the accomplishment of the goals specified in
1998—
1996—
§941g. Authorization of appropriations
(a) Authorization
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2028—
(1) $6,000,000 to implement fish and wildlife restoration proposals as selected by the Director under
(A) not more than the lesser of 33 1/3 percent or $2,000,000 may be allocated to implement regional projects by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, as selected by the Director under
(B) the lesser of 3 percent or $300,000 shall be allocated to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to cover costs incurred in administering the proposals by any entity; and
(2) $2,000,000, which shall be allocated for the activities of the Upper Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Offices and the Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office under
(b) Prohibition on use of funds for Federal acquisition of interests in land
No funds appropriated or used to carry out this chapter may be used for acquisition by the Federal Government of any interest in land.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Title I of
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (a)(1)(B).
2016—
Par. (1).
Par. (1)(A).
Par. (1)(B).
Par. (2).
2006—
1998—
1996—
§941h. Great Lakes monitoring, assessment, science, and research
(a) Definitions
In this section:
(1) Director
The term "Director" means the Director of the United States Geological Survey.
(2) Great Lakes Basin
The term "Great Lakes Basin" means the air, land, water, and living organisms in the United States within the drainage basin of the Saint Lawrence River at and upstream from the point at which such river and the Great Lakes become the international boundary between Canada and the United States.
(b) Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1) The Great Lakes support a diverse ecosystem, on which the vibrant and economically valuable Great Lakes fisheries depend.
(2) To continue successful fisheries management and coordination, as has occurred since signing of the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between the United States and Canada on September 10, 1954, management of the ecosystem and its fisheries require sound, reliable science, and the use of modern scientific technologies.
(3) Fisheries research is necessary to support multi-jurisdictional fishery management decisions and actions regarding recreational and sport fishing, commercial fisheries, tribal harvest, allocation decisions, and fish stocking activities.
(4) President Richard Nixon submitted, and the Congress approved, Reorganization Plan No. 4 (
(5) Reorganization Plan No. 4 expressly excluded fishery research activities within the Great Lakes from the transfer, retaining management and scientific research duties within the already-established jurisdictions under the 1954 Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries, including those of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and the Department of the Interior.
(c) Monitoring, assessment, science, and research
(1) In general
The Director may conduct monitoring, assessment, science, and research, in support of the binational fisheries within the Great Lakes Basin.
(2) Specific authorities
The Director shall, under paragraph (1)—
(A) execute a comprehensive, multi-lake, freshwater fisheries science program;
(B) coordinate with and work cooperatively with regional, State, tribal, and local governments; and
(C) consult with other interested entities groups, including academia and relevant Canadian agencies.
(3) Included research
To properly serve the needs of fisheries managers, monitoring, assessment, science, and research under this section may include—
(A) deepwater ecosystem sciences;
(B) biological and food-web components;
(C) fish movement and behavior investigations;
(D) fish population structures;
(E) fish habitat investigations;
(F) invasive species science;
(G) use of existing, new, and experimental biological assessment tools, equipment, vessels, other scientific instrumentation and laboratory capabilities necessary to support fishery management decisions; and
(H) studies to assess impacts on Great Lakes Fishery resources.
(4) Savings clause
Nothing in this section is intended or shall be construed to impede, supersede, or alter the authority of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, States, and Indian tribes under the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between the United States of America and Canada on September 10, 1954, and the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956 (
(d) Authorization of appropriations
For each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025, there is authorized to be appropriated $15,000,000 to carry out this section.
(
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Reorganization Plan No. 4, referred to in subsec. (b)(4), (5), probably means Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970, which is set out as a note under
The Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956, referred to in subsec. (c)(4), is act June 4, 1956, ch. 358,
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, and not as part of the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990 which comprises this chapter.